高级检索

人工智能双元注意力配置对突破性创新的非对称拥挤效应研究

The Asymmetric Crowding-Out Effect of Ambidextrous Artificial Intelligence Attention Allocation on Breakthrough Innovation

  • 摘要: 如何在人工智能(Artificial Intelligence,AI)技术探索与场景利用之间实现合理的资源配置,是企业推进突破性创新过程中需要面对的重要问题。基于2007—2024年中国A股上市公司数据,考察人工智能双元注意力配置对突破性创新的影响。研究发现,单一维度的AI技术探索或场景利用均有助于提升企业突破性创新产出,但在资源约束条件下,企业同时高度关注技术探索与场景利用,可能引发资源竞争与跨部门协调摩擦,从而形成抑制创新的拥挤效应。该拥挤效应表现出非对称演进特征:场景利用对技术研发的影响总体呈现相对平缓的线性变化;而技术探索对场景利用的约束作用则表现出一定的门槛特征——当技术探索注意力跨越特定阈值后,可能导致资源锁定与组织协调成本上升,使场景利用转化为创新产出的边际效率下降。调节效应显示,增加AI投资强度可形成专用性资源缓冲,深化数字化转型则能通过提升信息共享水平和降低跨部门协调成本缓解组织内耗,二者均能缓解双元注意力配置带来的拥挤损失。异质性分析表明,AI双元注意力配置的拥挤效应主要集中于高科技企业和无信息技术背景首席执行官领导的企业中。辩证评价了同步推进AI技术探索与场景利用战略的适用边界,为不同资源禀赋、技术基础和治理能力条件下的企业合理安排 AI 技术探索与场景利用的推进节奏与协同方式提供了决策参考。

     

    Abstract: How firms allocate resources between artificial intelligence (AI) technology exploration and application exploitation is a critical issue in the pursuit of breakthrough innovation. Using data from Chinese A-share listed firms from 2007 to 2024, this study examines the impact of ambidextrous AI attention allocation on firms' breakthrough innovation. The results show that attention to either AI technology exploration or AI application exploitation, when considered independently, promotes breakthrough innovation output. However, under resource constraints, simultaneous high levels of attention to both dimensions may generate resource competition and cross-departmental coordination frictions, thereby producing a crowding-out effect that suppresses innovation.This crowding-out effect exhibits an asymmetric evolutionary pattern. The effect of application exploitation on technology R&D follows a relatively smooth and linear trajectory, whereas the constraining effect of technology exploration on application exploitation displays a threshold pattern. Once attention to technology exploration exceeds a certain threshold, it may induce resource lock-in and increase organizational coordination costs, thereby reducing the marginal efficiency with which application exploitation is transformed into innovation output. Moderation analyses further indicate that greater AI investment intensity creates a dedicated resource buffer, while deeper digital transformation mitigates internal organizational frictions by enhancing information sharing and reducing cross-departmental coordination costs. Both mechanisms alleviate the crowding losses associated with ambidextrous AI attention allocation.Heterogeneity analyses show that the crowding-out effect of ambidextrous AI attention allocation is concentrated primarily among high-tech firms and firms led by CEOs without information technology backgrounds. This study provides a dialectical assessment of the boundary conditions under which firms can simultaneously advance AI technology exploration and scenario-based application exploitation. It also offers decision-making references for firms with different resource endowments, technological foundations, and governance capabilities to reasonably arrange the pace and coordination mechanisms of AI technology exploration and scenario-based application exploitation.

     

/

返回文章
返回