高级检索

财税政策如何驱动企业研发投入“质跃”?聚焦政策效应、互动机制与传导路径的探讨

How Can Fiscal and Tax Policies Drive the "Qualitative Leap" of Enterprise R&D Investment: Focus on Policy Effect, Interaction Mechanism and Transmission Path

  • 摘要: 财税激励对激发科技创新具有重要作用。基于间断平衡理论,利用2007—2023年沪深A股上市公司数据,从研发过程与方式视角探讨财税政策如何驱动研发投入实现由量变积累向质变突破的正向跳跃。研究发现,财政补贴与税收优惠均对研发投入正向跳跃呈现先抑制后促进的U型影响;两类政策存在显著的非对称互动效应,税收优惠重塑财政补贴的激励路径,而财政补贴强化税收优惠的U型效应并提高其作用门槛;财政补贴显著吸引风险资本与社会资本流入,税收优惠未表现出显著溢出效应。异质性分析表明,上述U型影响主要存在于成熟期企业和大规模企业中;财政补贴的作用在制造业企业中更为显著,而税收优惠的作用在非制造业企业中更为显著。进一步研究发现,寻租行为降低了财政补贴的作用阈值,但提高了税收优惠的作用阈值;数字化转型提高了两类政策促进研发投入正向跳跃的阈值。研究结论为优化创新激励政策设计提供了经验证据。

     

    Abstract: Fiscal and tax incentives play an important role in stimulating technological innovation. Drawing on Punctuated Equilibrium Theory and using data from Chinese A-share listed firms during 2007—2023, this study examines how fiscal and tax policies drive Research and Development (R&D) investment to achieve a positive leap from quantitative accumulation to qualitative breakthroughs from the perspective of R&D processes and innovation modes. The results show that both fiscal subsidies and tax incentives exhibit a U-shaped effect on positive leaps in R&D investment, characterized by an initial inhibitory effect followed by a promotional effect. The interaction between the two policy instruments is significantly asymmetric: tax incentives reshape the incentive pathway of fiscal subsidies, whereas fiscal subsidies strengthen the U-shaped effect of tax incentives and raise their incentive threshold. In addition, fiscal subsidies significantly attract inflows of venture capital and private capital, while tax incentives do not generate significant spillover effects. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the U-shaped effects are mainly observed among mature firms and large-scale enterprises. Moreover, the effect of fiscal subsidies is more pronounced in manufacturing firms, whereas the effect of tax incentives is stronger in non-manufacturing firms. Further analysis reveals that rent-seeking behavior lowers the threshold of fiscal subsidies but raises the threshold of tax incentives, while digital transformation increases the thresholds at which both policy instruments promote positive leaps in R&D investment. These findings provide empirical evidence for optimizing the design of innovation incentive policies.

     

/

返回文章
返回